Celeron 1007U vs Core Ultra 7 155H
Aggregate performance score
Ultra 7 155H outperforms Celeron 1007U by a whopping 2893% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron 1007U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 383 | 2742 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Meteor Lake-H | Intel Celeron |
| Architecture codename | Meteor Lake-H | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| Release date | 14 December 2023 (less than a year ago) | 20 January 2013 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $86 |
| Current price | no data | $205 (2.4x MSRP) |
Detailed specifications
Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron 1007U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 22 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.8 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 112 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 24 MB (shared) | 2 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | no data | 118 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,400 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron 1007U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | FCBGA1023 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron 1007U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | no data |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| My WiFi | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
| TSX | + | no data |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| Flex Memory Access | + | + |
| SIPP | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | + | no data |
| FDI | no data | + |
| Fast Memory Access | no data | + |
| Status | Launched | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron 1007U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | - |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Key | + | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
| Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron 1007U are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | - |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron 1007U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 96 GB | 32 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 25.6 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel® Arc™ graphics | Intel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® Processors |
| Quick Sync Video | + | - |
| Graphics max frequency | 2.25 GHz | 1 GHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron 1007U integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 4 | 3 |
| eDP | no data | + |
| DisplayPort | no data | + |
| HDMI | no data | + |
| SDVO | no data | + |
| CRT | no data | + |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron 1007U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL) | no data |
| Max resolution over eDP | 3840x2400 @ 120Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron 1007U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 12.2 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron 1007U.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 28 | 16 |
| PCI support | 5.0 and 4.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core Ultra 7 155H outperforms Celeron 1007U by 2893% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core Ultra 7 155H outperforms Celeron 1007U by 2891% in Passmark.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Core Ultra 7 155H outperforms Celeron 1007U by 713% in 3DMark06 CPU.
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Core Ultra 7 155H outperforms Celeron 1007U by 2523% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Core Ultra 7 155H outperforms Celeron 1007U by 392% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 16.16 | 0.54 |
| Recency | 14 December 2023 | 20 January 2013 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 2 |
| Threads | 22 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 17 Watt |
The Core Ultra 7 155H is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 1007U in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron 1007U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
