EPYC 4464P vs Ultra 5 135H

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 5 135H
2023
14 cores / 18 threads, 28 Watt
14.74
EPYC 4464P
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
31.13
+111%

EPYC 4464P outperforms Core Ultra 5 135H by a whopping 111% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 5 135H and EPYC 4464P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking492134
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data66.40
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-Hno data
Power efficiency48.8927.54
Architecture codenameMeteor Lake-H (2023)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$342$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 5 135H and EPYC 4464P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads1824
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz5.4 GHz
L1 cache112 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache18 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 4 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data2x 71 mm2
Maximum core temperature110 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data61 °C
Number of transistorsno data13,140 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 5 135H and EPYC 4464P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA2049AM5
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 5 135H and EPYC 4464P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 5 135H and EPYC 4464P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 5 135H and EPYC 4464P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 5 135H and EPYC 4464P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5
Maximum memory size96 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® Arc™ graphicsAMD Radeon Graphics
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency2.2 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 5 135H and EPYC 4464P integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 5 135H and EPYC 4464P integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)no data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2400 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 5 135H and EPYC 4464P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.2no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 5 135H and EPYC 4464P.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes828
PCI support5.0 and 4.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ultra 5 135H 14.74
EPYC 4464P 31.13
+111%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ultra 5 135H 22984
EPYC 4464P 48518
+111%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.74 31.13
Recency 14 December 2023 21 May 2024
Physical cores 14 12
Threads 18 24
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 105 Watt

Ultra 5 135H has 16.7% more physical cores, and 275% lower power consumption.

EPYC 4464P, on the other hand, has a 111.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 months, and 33.3% more threads.

The EPYC 4464P is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 5 135H in performance tests.

Be aware that Core Ultra 5 135H is a notebook processor while EPYC 4464P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 5 135H and EPYC 4464P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 5 135H
Core Ultra 5 135H
AMD EPYC 4464P
EPYC 4464P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 9 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 135H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate EPYC 4464P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 5 135H or EPYC 4464P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.