EPYC 4244P vs Ultra 5 135H
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 4244P outperforms Core Ultra 5 135H by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core Ultra 5 135H and EPYC 4244P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 508 | 371 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 56.27 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Meteor Lake-H | no data |
| Power efficiency | 48.10 | 25.13 |
| Architecture codename | Meteor Lake-H (2023) | Raphael (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 14 December 2023 (1 year ago) | 21 May 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $342 | $229 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core Ultra 5 135H and EPYC 4244P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 18 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.6 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 112 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 18 MB (shared) | 32 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | no data | 71 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 110 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 61 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 6,570 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core Ultra 5 135H and EPYC 4244P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 2049 | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 5 135H and EPYC 4244P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Core Ultra 5 135H and EPYC 4244P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 5 135H and EPYC 4244P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 5 135H and EPYC 4244P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU ( - 2200 MHz) | AMD Radeon Graphics |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 5 135H and EPYC 4244P.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | 28 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 14.15 | 17.16 |
| Integrated graphics card | 17.23 | 1.99 |
| Recency | 14 December 2023 | 21 May 2024 |
| Physical cores | 14 | 6 |
| Threads | 18 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 65 Watt |
Ultra 5 135H has 765.8% faster integrated GPU, 133.3% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and 132.1% lower power consumption.
EPYC 4244P, on the other hand, has a 21.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 months, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
The EPYC 4244P is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 5 135H in performance tests.
Be aware that Core Ultra 5 135H is a notebook processor while EPYC 4244P is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 5 135H and EPYC 4244P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
