Ryzen 7 8840HS vs Ultra 5 125H

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 5 125H
2023
14 cores / 18 threads, 28 Watt
14.56
Ryzen 7 8840HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
15.97
+9.7%

Ryzen 7 8840HS outperforms Core Ultra 5 125H by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 5 125H and Ryzen 7 8840HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking516444
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-Hno data
Power efficiency47.4252.01
Architecture codenameMeteor Lake-H (2023)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
Release date14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)6 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$375no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 5 125H and Ryzen 7 8840HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1816
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache112 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache18 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 4 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperature110 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 5 125H and Ryzen 7 8840HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA2049FP8
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 5 125H and Ryzen 7 8840HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 5 125H and Ryzen 7 8840HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 5 125H and Ryzen 7 8840HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 5 125H and Ryzen 7 8840HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5
Maximum memory size96 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® Arc™ graphicsAMD Radeon 780M
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency2.2 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 5 125H and Ryzen 7 8840HS integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 5 125H and Ryzen 7 8840HS integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)no data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2400 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 5 125H and Ryzen 7 8840HS integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.2no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 5 125H and Ryzen 7 8840HS.

PCIe version5.04.0
PCI Express lanes2820
PCI support5.0 and 4.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ultra 5 125H 14.56
Ryzen 7 8840HS 15.97
+9.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ultra 5 125H 22281
Ryzen 7 8840HS 24445
+9.7%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ultra 5 125H 2054
+0.4%
Ryzen 7 8840HS 2045

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ultra 5 125H 247
Ryzen 7 8840HS 268
+8.7%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ultra 5 125H 10542
+6.5%
Ryzen 7 8840HS 9897

Blender(-)

Ultra 5 125H 267
+14.9%
Ryzen 7 8840HS 232

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ultra 5 125H 1676
Ryzen 7 8840HS 1942
+15.9%

7-Zip Single

Ultra 5 125H 5043
Ryzen 7 8840HS 6205
+23%

WebXPRT 3

Ultra 5 125H 254
Ryzen 7 8840HS 308
+21.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.56 15.97
Physical cores 14 8
Threads 18 16

Ultra 5 125H has 75% more physical cores and 12.5% more threads.

Ryzen 7 8840HS, on the other hand, has a 9.7% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core Ultra 5 125H and Ryzen 7 8840HS.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 5 125H and Ryzen 7 8840HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
Core Ultra 5 125H
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
Ryzen 7 8840HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 321 vote

Rate Core Ultra 5 125H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 148 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 8840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 5 125H or Ryzen 7 8840HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.