Celeron 3765U vs Ultra 5 125H

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 5 125H
2023
14 cores / 18 threads, 28 Watt
14.08
+1682%
Celeron 3765U
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.79

Core Ultra 5 125H outperforms Celeron 3765U by a whopping 1682% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 5 125H and Celeron 3765U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking5192613
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-HIntel Celeron
Power efficiency47.394.96
Architecture codenameMeteor Lake-H (2023)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)1 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$375$107

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 5 125H and Celeron 3765U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads182
Base clock speed3.6 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz1.9 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cache112 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache2 MB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache18 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithographyIntel 4 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data82 mm2
Maximum core temperature110 °C105 °C
Number of transistorsno data1300 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 5 125H and Celeron 3765U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA2049FCBGA1168
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 5 125H and Celeron 3765U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Smart Responseno data-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 5 125H and Celeron 3765U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection-+
OS Guard+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 5 125H and Celeron 3765U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 5 125H and Celeron 3765U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3
Maximum memory size96 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® Arc™ graphicsIntel® HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Videono data+
Graphics max frequency2.2 GHz850 MHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 5 125H and Celeron 3765U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported43
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 5 125H and Celeron 3765U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)no data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2400 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 5 125H and Celeron 3765U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.211.2/12
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 5 125H and Celeron 3765U.

PCIe version5.02.0
PCI Express lanes2812
PCI support5.0 and 4.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ultra 5 125H 14.08
+1682%
Celeron 3765U 0.79

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ultra 5 125H 22282
+1680%
Celeron 3765U 1252

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.08 0.79
Recency 14 December 2023 1 June 2015
Physical cores 14 2
Threads 18 2
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 15 Watt

Ultra 5 125H has a 1682.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and 600% more physical cores and 800% more threads.

Celeron 3765U, on the other hand, has 86.7% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 5 125H is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3765U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 5 125H and Celeron 3765U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
Core Ultra 5 125H
Intel Celeron 3765U
Celeron 3765U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 346 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 125H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 3765U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 5 125H or Celeron 3765U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.