Processor N150 vs Ultra 5 115U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 5 115U
2023
8 cores / 10 threads, 15 Watt
6.70
+173%

Core Ultra 5 115U outperforms Processor N150 by a whopping 173% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12432016
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Power efficiency18.8517.23
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameMeteor Lake (2023)Twin Lake (2024−2025)
Release date14 December 2023 (2 years ago)20 November 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Core Ultra 5 115U and Processor N150: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads104
Base clock speed1.5 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cache112 KB (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)2 MB (shared)
L3 cache10 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm10 nm
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 5 115U and Processor N150 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 2049Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 5 115U and Processor N150. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX+-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 5 115U and Processor N150 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 5 115U and Processor N150 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 5 115U and Processor N150. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5 Depends on motherboardDDR4, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardArc Xe-LPG 48EUIntel UHD Graphics 730

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 5 115U and Processor N150.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanes209

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ultra 5 115U 6.70
+173%
Processor N150 2.45

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ultra 5 115U 8678
+73%
Processor N150 5016

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ultra 5 115U 32139
+144%
Processor N150 13159

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ultra 5 115U 1165
+176%
Processor N150 423

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ultra 5 115U 217
+41.7%
Processor N150 153

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ultra 5 115U 4.8
+104%
Processor N150 2.4

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Ultra 5 115U 254
+81.3%
Processor N150 140

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Ultra 5 115U 78
+173%
Processor N150 28

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ultra 5 115U 5958
+131%
Processor N150 2579

7-Zip Single

Ultra 5 115U 4367
+13.2%
Processor N150 3859

7-Zip

Ultra 5 115U 29111
+161%
Processor N150 11171

WebXPRT 4 Overall

Ultra 5 115U 221
+74.3%
Processor N150 127

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

Ultra 5 115U 761
Processor N150 2429
+219%

Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core

Ultra 5 115U 7409
+149%
Processor N150 2980

Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core

Ultra 5 115U 2096
+67.8%
Processor N150 1249

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.70 2.45
Recency 14 December 2023 20 November 2024
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 10 4
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 6 Watt

Ultra 5 115U has a 173% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 150% more threads, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

Processor N150, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and 150% lower power consumption.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 115U is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Processor N150 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 7 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 115U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 91 votes

Rate Processor N150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core Ultra 5 115U and Processor N150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.