Ultra 5 115U vs Processor N200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Processor N200
2023, $193
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.41
Core Ultra 5 115U
2023
8 cores / 10 threads, 15 Watt
6.53
+363%

Core Ultra 5 115U outperforms Processor N200 by a whopping 363% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24111229
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.64no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-Nno data
Power efficiency9.9618.45
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameAlder Lake-N (2023)Meteor Lake (2023)
Release date3 January 2023 (3 years ago)14 December 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$193no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Processor N200 and Core Ultra 5 115U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads410
Base clock speed0.1 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.2 GHz
L1 cache96 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (shared)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)10 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm7 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Processor N200 and Core Ultra 5 115U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 1264Intel BGA 2049
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Processor N200 and Core Ultra 5 115U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX-+

Security technologies

Processor N200 and Core Ultra 5 115U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Processor N200 and Core Ultra 5 115U are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Processor N200 and Core Ultra 5 115U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channelDDR5 Depends on motherboard

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)Arc Xe-LPG 48EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Processor N200 and Core Ultra 5 115U.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes920

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Processor N200 1.41
Ultra 5 115U 6.53
+363%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Processor N200 3937
Ultra 5 115U 8678
+120%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Processor N200 7549
Ultra 5 115U 32139
+326%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Processor N200 219
Ultra 5 115U 1165
+432%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Processor N200 113
Ultra 5 115U 217
+92%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Processor N200 3.2
Ultra 5 115U 4.8
+50%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Processor N200 16
Ultra 5 115U 78
+376%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Processor N200 80
Ultra 5 115U 254
+217%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Processor N200 1540
Ultra 5 115U 5958
+287%

7-Zip Single

Processor N200 3230
Ultra 5 115U 4367
+35.2%

7-Zip

Processor N200 7146
Ultra 5 115U 29111
+307%

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

Processor N200 4297
+465%
Ultra 5 115U 761

Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core

Processor N200 1660
Ultra 5 115U 7409
+346%

Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core

Processor N200 956
Ultra 5 115U 2096
+119%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.41 6.53
Recency 3 January 2023 14 December 2023
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 10
Chip lithography 10 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 15 Watt

Processor N200 has 150% lower power consumption.

Ultra 5 115U, on the other hand, has a 363.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, 100% more physical cores and 150% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 115U is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Processor N200 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Processor N200
Processor N200
Intel Core Ultra 5 115U
Core Ultra 5 115U

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 184 votes

Rate Processor N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 4 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 115U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Processor N200 and Core Ultra 5 115U, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.