Ryzen Embedded 8840U vs Solo ULV U1400

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core Solo ULV U1400 and Ryzen Embedded 8840U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Hawk Point (2024)
Release dateApril 2006 (18 years ago)2 April 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Core Solo ULV U1400 and Ryzen Embedded 8840U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads116
Base clock speedno data3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache64 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm4 nm
Die size90 mm2178 mm2
Number of transistors151 million25,000 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Core Solo ULV U1400 and Ryzen Embedded 8840U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket479FP8
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Solo ULV U1400 and Ryzen Embedded 8840U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Solo ULV U1400 and Ryzen Embedded 8840U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Solo ULV U1400 and Ryzen Embedded 8840U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Solo ULV U1400 and Ryzen Embedded 8840U.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 16
Chip lithography 65 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 28 Watt

Solo ULV U1400 has 460% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Embedded 8840U, on the other hand, has 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core Solo ULV U1400 and Ryzen Embedded 8840U. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Solo ULV U1400 and Ryzen Embedded 8840U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Solo ULV U1400
Core Solo ULV U1400
AMD Ryzen Embedded 8840U
Ryzen Embedded 8840U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate Core Solo ULV U1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 21 vote

Rate Ryzen Embedded 8840U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Solo ULV U1400 or Ryzen Embedded 8840U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.