Atom N450 vs Solo U1500

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Solo U1500
1 core / 1 thread, 5 Watt
0.10
Atom N450
2009
1 core / 2 threads, 5 Watt
0.13
+30%

Atom N450 outperforms Core Solo U1500 by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Solo U1500 and Atom N450 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33803350
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCore SoloIntel Atom
Power efficiency1.892.05
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Pinetrail (2009−2011)
Release dateno data21 December 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$64

Detailed specifications

Core Solo U1500 and Atom N450 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads12
Base clock speed1.33 GHz1.66 GHz
Boost clock speed1.33 GHz1.67 GHz
Bus rate533 MHz533 MHz
L1 cacheno data56 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data512 KB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB L2 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data66 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data123 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V - 1.1Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core Solo U1500 and Atom N450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPBGA479FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)5.5 Watt5.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Solo U1500 and Atom N450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States-no data
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching--
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core Solo U1500 and Atom N450 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Solo U1500 and Atom N450 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Solo U1500 and Atom N450. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2
Maximum memory sizeno data2 GB
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Solo U1500 0.10
Atom N450 0.13
+30%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Solo U1500 164
Atom N450 203
+23.8%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Solo U1500 545
+10.3%
Atom N450 494

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.10 0.13
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm

Atom N450 has a 30% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Atom N450 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Solo U1500 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Solo U1500 and Atom N450, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Solo U1500
Core Solo U1500
Intel Atom N450
Atom N450

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Core Solo U1500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 182 votes

Rate Atom N450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Solo U1500 or Atom N450, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.