Pentium 4 2.80 vs Solo T1350
Aggregate performance score
Pentium 4 2.80 outperforms Core Solo T1350 by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3576 | 3544 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Core Solo | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.17 | 0.05 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Yonah (2005−2006) | Northwood (2002−2004) |
| Release date | January 2006 (19 years ago) | August 2002 (23 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core Solo T1350 and Pentium 4 2.80 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 1.86 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.86 GHz | 2.79 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 8 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 90 mm2 | 146 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 151 million | 55 million |
| 64 bit support | - | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 0.95V-1.262V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core Solo T1350 and Pentium 4 2.80 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478 | 478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 110 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Solo T1350 and Pentium 4 2.80. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core Solo T1350 and Pentium 4 2.80 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Solo T1350 and Pentium 4 2.80 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Solo T1350 and Pentium 4 2.80. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | DDR1, DDR2 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.11 | 0.13 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 110 Watt |
Solo T1350 has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 254.8% lower power consumption.
Pentium 4 2.80, on the other hand, has a 18.2% higher aggregate performance score.
The Intel Pentium 4 2.80 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core Solo T1350 in performance tests.
Be aware that Core Solo T1350 is a notebook processor while Pentium 4 2.80 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
