EPYC 7702P vs Solo T1350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Solo T1350
2006
1 core / 1 thread, 31 Watt
0.11
EPYC 7702P
2019, $4,425
64 cores / 128 threads, 200 Watt
36.39
+32982%

EPYC 7702P outperforms Core Solo T1350 by a whopping 32982% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3678118
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.06
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesCore SoloAMD EPYC
Power efficiency0.177.68
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release dateJanuary 2006 (20 years ago)7 August 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,425

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core Solo T1350 and EPYC 7702P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads1128
Base clock speed1.86 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.86 GHz3.35 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
Multiplierno data20
L1 cache64 KB4 MB
L2 cache2 MB32 MB
L3 cache0 KB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size90 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors151 million4,800 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range0.95V-1.262Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core Solo T1350 and EPYC 7702P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPPGA478TR4
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Solo T1350 and EPYC 7702P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core Solo T1350 and EPYC 7702P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Solo T1350 and EPYC 7702P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Solo T1350 and EPYC 7702P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Solo T1350 0.11
EPYC 7702P 36.39
+32982%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Solo T1350 194
Samples: 35
EPYC 7702P 63021
+32385%
Samples: 27

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.11 36.39
Physical cores 1 64
Threads 1 128
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 200 Watt

Solo T1350 has 545% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7702P, on the other hand, has a 32982% higher aggregate performance score, 6300% more physical cores and 12700% more threads, and a 829% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD EPYC 7702P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core Solo T1350 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core Solo T1350 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7702P is a server/workstation one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 7 votes

Rate Core Solo T1350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 33 votes

Rate EPYC 7702P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core Solo T1350 and EPYC 7702P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.