Ryzen 5 5500 vs Solo T1350
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 5500 outperforms Core Solo T1350 by a whopping 9891% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3591 | 777 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 1 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 49.97 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Core Solo | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.17 | 7.15 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Yonah (2005−2006) | Cezanne (2021−2024) |
| Release date | January 2006 (19 years ago) | 4 April 2022 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $159 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Core Solo T1350 and Ryzen 5 5500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 1.86 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.86 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 90 mm2 | 180 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 151 million | 10,700 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 0.95V-1.262V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core Solo T1350 and Ryzen 5 5500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Solo T1350 and Ryzen 5 5500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Core Solo T1350 and Ryzen 5 5500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Solo T1350 and Ryzen 5 5500 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Solo T1350 and Ryzen 5 5500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | DDR4-3200 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Solo T1350 and Ryzen 5 5500.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.11 | 10.99 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 6 |
| Threads | 1 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 65 Watt |
Solo T1350 has 109.7% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 5 5500, on the other hand, has a 9890.9% higher aggregate performance score, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD Ryzen 5 5500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core Solo T1350 in performance tests.
Be aware that Core Solo T1350 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 5500 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
