Xeon Bronze 3206R vs Solo T1200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Celeron M 410 Celeron M 420 Celeron M 430 Celeron M 440 T2050 T2250 T2300 T2400 T2500 Pentium Dual Core T2060 Pentium Dual Core T2080 Pentium Dual Core T2130
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Bronze 3104 Bronze 3106 Bronze 3204 Bronze 3206R Bronze 3408U Bronze 3508U

Aggregate performance score

Core Solo T1200
2006
1 core / 1 thread, 2 Watt
0.14
Xeon Bronze 3206R
2020
8 cores / 8 threads, 85 Watt
6.12
+4271%

Xeon Bronze 3206R outperforms Core Solo T1200 by a whopping 4271% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Solo T1200 Solo T1200
Xeon Bronze 3206R Xeon Bronze 3206R

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking35841251
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesCore Solono data
Power efficiencyno data7.72
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)no data
Release dateJanuary 2006 (19 years ago)1 January 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core Solo T1200 and Xeon Bronze 3206R basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads18
Base clock speedno data1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz1.9 GHz
Bus rate667 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KBno data
L2 cache2 MBno data
L3 cache0 KB11 MB
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Die size90 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data78 °C
Number of transistors151 millionno data
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core Solo T1200 and Xeon Bronze 3206R compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket479FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)2 MB85 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Solo T1200 and Xeon Bronze 3206R. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core Solo T1200 and Xeon Bronze 3206R technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Solo T1200 and Xeon Bronze 3206R are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Solo T1200 and Xeon Bronze 3206R. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR4-2133
Maximum memory sizeno data1 TB
Max memory channelsno data6
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Solo T1200 and Xeon Bronze 3206R.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.14 6.12
Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 8
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 85 Watt

Solo T1200 has 4150% lower power consumption.

Xeon Bronze 3206R, on the other hand, has a 4271.4% higher aggregate performance score, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Xeon Bronze 3206R is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core Solo T1200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core Solo T1200 is a notebook processor while Xeon Bronze 3206R is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

Intel Core Solo T1200
Core Solo T1200
Intel Xeon Bronze 3206R
Xeon Bronze 3206R
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Solo T1200 Core Solo T1200
vs
GX-210JA GX 210JA
Xeon Bronze 3206R Xeon Bronze 3206R
vs
Xeon Silver 4208 Xeon Silver 4208
Solo T1200 Core Solo T1200
vs
C-50 C 50
Celeron M 420 Intel M 420
vs
Ryzen 3 5300G 5300G
Celeron M 420 Intel M 420
vs
i9-13900H 13900H
Celeron M 380 Intel M 380
vs
Pentium M 733 733
Celeron M 380 Intel M 380
vs
Pentium 4 HT 670 HT 670
Celeron M 380 Intel M 380
vs
Ryzen 3 5125C 5125C
Solo T1200 Intel Solo T1200
vs
Ryzen 7 7800X3D 7800X3D
Solo T1200 Intel Solo T1200
vs
EPYC 9535 9535
Athlon 64 TF-20 AMD 64 TF-20
vs
Athlon X2 L310 L310
Athlon 64 TF-20 AMD 64 TF-20
vs
Celeron M 360 360
Athlon 64 TF-20 AMD 64 TF-20
vs
Pentium III 800 800

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

1.5 2 votes

Rate Core Solo T1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 3 votes

Rate Xeon Bronze 3206R on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core Solo T1200 and Xeon Bronze 3206R, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.