FX-6120 vs Solo T1200
Aggregate performance score
FX-6120 outperforms Core Solo T1200 by a whopping 1457% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3585 | 2035 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Core Solo | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 2.46 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Yonah (2005−2006) | Zambezi (2011−2012) |
| Release date | January 2006 (19 years ago) | 23 October 2012 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core Solo T1200 and FX-6120 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 6 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 667 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 288 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 6 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 90 mm2 | 315 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 151 million | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core Solo T1200 and FX-6120 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 479 | AM3+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2 MB | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Solo T1200 and FX-6120. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Solo T1200 and FX-6120 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Solo T1200 and FX-6120. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | DDR3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Solo T1200 and FX-6120.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.14 | 2.18 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 6 |
| Threads | 1 | 6 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2 Watt | 95 Watt |
Solo T1200 has 4650% lower power consumption.
FX-6120, on the other hand, has a 1457.1% higher aggregate performance score, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD FX-6120 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core Solo T1200 in performance tests.
Be aware that Core Solo T1200 is a notebook processor while FX-6120 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
