Core Solo T1200 vs FX-4100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-4100 and Core Solo T1200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1970not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.24no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataCore Solo
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Yonah (2005−2006)
Release date12 October 2011 (12 years ago)January 2006 (18 years ago)
Current price$28 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-4100 and Core Solo T1200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed3.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus supportno data667 MHz
L1 cache192 KB64 KB
L2 cache4096 KB2 MB
L3 cache8192 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size315 mm290 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million151 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.1 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-4100 and Core Solo T1200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+479
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt27 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4100 and Core Solo T1200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4100 and Core Solo T1200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4100 and Core Solo T1200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4100 and Core Solo T1200.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 27 Watt

We couldn't decide between FX-4100 and Core Solo T1200. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-4100 is a desktop processor while Core Solo T1200 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4100 and Core Solo T1200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-4100
FX-4100
Intel Core Solo T1200
Core Solo T1200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 832 votes

Rate FX-4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 2 votes

Rate Core Solo T1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-4100 or Core Solo T1200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.