Solo T1200 vs FX-4100
Aggregate performance score
FX-4100 outperforms Core Solo T1200 by a whopping 964% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2347 | 3583 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Core Solo |
| Power efficiency | 1.68 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Zambezi (2011−2012) | Yonah (2005−2006) |
| Release date | 12 October 2011 (14 years ago) | January 2006 (19 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
FX-4100 and Core Solo T1200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 667 MHz |
| L1 cache | 192 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 8192 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | 90 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 71 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | 151 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
| P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.1 V - Max: 1.4125 V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on FX-4100 and Core Solo T1200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM3+ | 479 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 2 MB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4100 and Core Solo T1200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4100 and Core Solo T1200 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4100 and Core Solo T1200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4100 and Core Solo T1200.
| PCIe version | n/a | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.49 | 0.14 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 2 Watt |
FX-4100 has a 964.3% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.
Solo T1200, on the other hand, has 4650% lower power consumption.
The AMD FX-4100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core Solo T1200 in performance tests.
Note that FX-4100 is a desktop processor while Core Solo T1200 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
