EPYC Embedded 3451 vs Solo T1200
Primary details
Comparing Core Solo T1200 and EPYC Embedded 3451 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3304 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Core Solo | AMD EPYC Embedded |
| Power efficiency | 0.56 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Yonah (2005−2006) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | January 2006 (18 years ago) | 21 February 2018 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $880 |
Detailed specifications
Core Solo T1200 and EPYC Embedded 3451 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.15 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 667 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 21.5 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 32 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 90 mm2 | 2x 213 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 151 million | 4,800 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core Solo T1200 and EPYC Embedded 3451 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | 479 | AMD BGA SP4r2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 100 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Solo T1200 and EPYC Embedded 3451. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Solo T1200 and EPYC Embedded 3451 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Solo T1200 and EPYC Embedded 3451. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1 TiB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 85.33 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Solo T1200 and EPYC Embedded 3451.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 64 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 16 |
| Threads | 1 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 100 Watt |
Solo T1200 has 270.4% lower power consumption.
EPYC Embedded 3451, on the other hand, has 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Core Solo T1200 and EPYC Embedded 3451. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core Solo T1200 is a notebook processor while EPYC Embedded 3451 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core Solo T1200 and EPYC Embedded 3451, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
