EPYC 9654 vs M-5Y10

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core M-5Y10
2014
2 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
1.03
EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads, 360 Watt
75.70
+7250%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Core M-5Y10 by a whopping 7250% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core M-5Y10 and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24516
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.36
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core MAMD EPYC
Power efficiency19.4819.89
Architecture codenameBroadwell-Y (2014)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date5 September 2014 (10 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,805

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core M-5Y10 and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)96
Threads4192
Base clock speed0.8 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Multiplier824
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size50 mm212x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Number of transistors1300 Million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Core M-5Y10 and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA1234SP5
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core M-5Y10 and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core M-5Y10 and EPYC 9654 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core M-5Y10 and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core M-5Y10 and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size16 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s460.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 5300no data
Max video memory16 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency800 MHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core M-5Y10 and EPYC 9654 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core M-5Y10 and EPYC 9654 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.42560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort2560x1600@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core M-5Y10 and EPYC 9654 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core M-5Y10 and EPYC 9654.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes12128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M-5Y10 1.03
EPYC 9654 75.70
+7250%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

M-5Y10 1644
EPYC 9654 120246
+7214%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

M-5Y10 462
EPYC 9654 1837
+298%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

M-5Y10 958
EPYC 9654 18836
+1866%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.03 75.70
Recency 5 September 2014 10 November 2022
Physical cores 2 96
Threads 4 192
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 360 Watt

M-5Y10 has 8900% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9654, on the other hand, has a 7249.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 4700% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core M-5Y10 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core M-5Y10 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9654 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core M-5Y10 and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core M-5Y10
Core M-5Y10
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 9 votes

Rate Core M-5Y10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 995 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core M-5Y10 or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.