EPYC 7452 vs Duo T2600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Duo T2600
2006, $440
2 cores / 2 threads, 31 Watt
0.26
EPYC 7452
2019, $2,025
32 cores / 64 threads, 155 Watt
26.15
+9958%

EPYC 7452 outperforms Core Duo T2600 by a whopping 9958% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3443243
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.48
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core DuoAMD EPYC
Power efficiency0.357.12
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date5 January 2006 (20 years ago)7 August 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$440$2,025

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Duo T2600 and EPYC 7452 have a nearly equal value for money.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Core Duo T2600 and EPYC 7452: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads264
Base clock speed2.16 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.16 GHz3.35 GHz
Bus rate667 MHzno data
Multiplierno data23.5
L1 cache0 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size90 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors151 Million4,800 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range1.1625V - 1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core Duo T2600 and EPYC 7452 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
SocketPPGA478, PBGA479TR4
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Duo T2600 and EPYC 7452. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core Duo T2600 and EPYC 7452 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Duo T2600 and EPYC 7452 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Duo T2600 and EPYC 7452. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Duo T2600 0.26
EPYC 7452 26.15
+9958%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Duo T2600 460
Samples: 71
EPYC 7452 45658
+9826%
Samples: 34

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.26 26.15
Recency 5 January 2006 7 August 2019
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 2 64
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 155 Watt

Duo T2600 has 400% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7452, on the other hand, has a 9958% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 829% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD EPYC 7452 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core Duo T2600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core Duo T2600 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7452 is a server/workstation one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 9 votes

Rate Core Duo T2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 71 votes

Rate EPYC 7452 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core Duo T2600 and EPYC 7452, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.