Celeron N2806 vs Duo T2500
Aggregate performance score
Celeron N2806 outperforms Core Duo T2500 by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3423 | 3377 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Core Duo | Intel Celeron |
| Power efficiency | 0.32 | 2.97 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Yonah (2005−2006) | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) |
| Release date | January 2006 (19 years ago) | 1 December 2013 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $120 | $107 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Duo T2500 and Celeron N2806 have a nearly equal value for money.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Core Duo T2500 and Celeron N2806 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 667 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 0 KB | 56K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 90 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 151 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1.1625V - 1.3V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core Duo T2500 and Celeron N2806 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | PBGA479,PPGA478 | FCBGA1170 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 4.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Duo T2500 and Celeron N2806. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
| Idle States | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| Smart Connect | no data | + |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
| RST | no data | - |
Security technologies
Core Duo T2500 and Celeron N2806 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | + |
| Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Duo T2500 and Celeron N2806 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Duo T2500 and Celeron N2806. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 756 MHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core Duo T2500 and Celeron N2806 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 2 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Duo T2500 and Celeron N2806.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 4 |
| USB revision | no data | 3.0 and 2.0 |
| Total number of SATA ports | no data | 2 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 5 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.23 | 0.28 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 4 Watt |
Celeron N2806 has a 21.7% higher aggregate performance score, a 195.5% more advanced lithography process, and 675% lower power consumption.
The Intel Celeron N2806 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core Duo T2500 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
