Ultra 5 245KF vs Duo T2400

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Duo T2400
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 31 Watt
0.23
Core Ultra 5 245KF
2024
14 cores / 14 threads, 125 Watt
27.55
+11878%

Core Ultra 5 245KF outperforms Core Duo T2400 by a whopping 11878% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Duo T2400 and Core Ultra 5 245KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3190177
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data82.02
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesCore Duono data
Power efficiency0.7020.87
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release dateJanuary 2006 (18 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$16$294

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core Duo T2400 and Core Ultra 5 245KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads214
Base clock speed1.83 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.83 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus rate667 MHzno data
L1 cache0 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm3 nm
Die size90 mm2243 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors151 million17,800 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range1.1625V - 1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core Duo T2400 and Core Ultra 5 245KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPPGA478, PBGA4791851
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Duo T2400 and Core Ultra 5 245KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core Duo T2400 and Core Ultra 5 245KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Duo T2400 and Core Ultra 5 245KF are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Duo T2400 and Core Ultra 5 245KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Duo T2400 and Core Ultra 5 245KF.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Duo T2400 0.23
Ultra 5 245KF 27.55
+11878%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Duo T2400 362
Ultra 5 245KF 43759
+11988%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.23 27.55
Physical cores 2 14
Threads 2 14
Chip lithography 65 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 125 Watt

Duo T2400 has 303.2% lower power consumption.

Ultra 5 245KF, on the other hand, has a 11878.3% higher aggregate performance score, 600% more physical cores and 600% more threads, and a 2066.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 5 245KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Duo T2400 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core Duo T2400 is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 5 245KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Duo T2400 and Core Ultra 5 245KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Duo T2400
Core Duo T2400
Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF
Core Ultra 5 245KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 25 votes

Rate Core Duo T2400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 12 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 245KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Duo T2400 or Core Ultra 5 245KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.