Athlon 64 X2 3800+ vs Duo T2300E

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core Duo T2300E and Athlon 64 X2 3800+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated3013
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesCore Duono data
Power efficiencyno data0.43
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Manchester (2005−2006)
Release dateno dataAugust 2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core Duo T2300E and Athlon 64 X2 3800+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.66 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.66 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate667 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data256K
L2 cacheno data512 KB
L3 cache2 MB L2 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data220 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data154 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.7625-1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core Duo T2300E and Athlon 64 X2 3800+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPBGA479, PPGA478939
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Duo T2300E and Athlon 64 X2 3800+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core Duo T2300E and Athlon 64 X2 3800+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Duo T2300E and Athlon 64 X2 3800+ are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 89 Watt

Duo T2300E has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 187.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core Duo T2300E and Athlon 64 X2 3800+. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core Duo T2300E is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 X2 3800+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Duo T2300E and Athlon 64 X2 3800+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Duo T2300E
Core Duo T2300E
AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+
Athlon 64 X2 3800+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 11 votes

Rate Core Duo T2300E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 94 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Duo T2300E or Athlon 64 X2 3800+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.