Ryzen AI 9 465 vs Duo T2050

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Duo T2050
2005
2 cores / 2 threads, 31 Watt
0.19
Ryzen AI 9 465
10 cores / 20 threads, 28 Watt
13.05
+6768%

Ryzen AI 9 465 outperforms Core Duo T2050 by a whopping 6768% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3532671
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCore Duono data
Power efficiency0.2619.68
DesignerIntelAMD
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Gorgon Point (2026)
Release dateMay 2005 (20 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Core Duo T2050 and Ryzen AI 9 465 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads220
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz5 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cache0 KBno data
L2 cache2 MBno data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography65 nmno data
Die size90 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors151 millionno data
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.7625-1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core Duo T2050 and Ryzen AI 9 465 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketPPGA478no data
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Duo T2050 and Ryzen AI 9 465. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core Duo T2050 and Ryzen AI 9 465 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Duo T2050 and Ryzen AI 9 465 are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Duo T2050 and Ryzen AI 9 465. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.19 13.05
Physical cores 2 10
Threads 2 20
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen AI 9 465 has a 6768.4% higher aggregate performance score, 400% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and 10.7% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core Duo T2050 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Duo T2050
Core Duo T2050
AMD Ryzen AI 9 465
Ryzen AI 9 465

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 13 votes

Rate Core Duo T2050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 4 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 465 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core Duo T2050 and Ryzen AI 9 465, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.