Microsoft SQ1 vs 7 245HX
Aggregate performance score
Core 7 245HX outperforms Microsoft SQ1 by a whopping 581% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 312 | 1834 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Arrow Lake | Qualcomm Snapdragon |
| Designer | Intel | Microsoft |
| Architecture codename | Arrow Lake-HX (2025−2026) | Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019) |
| Release date | 1 April 2026 (less than a year ago) | 2 October 2019 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Core 7 245HX and Microsoft SQ1: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 14 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.6 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L2 cache | 24 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 26 MB | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 7 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core 7 245HX and Microsoft SQ1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | W |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) (300 - 1800 MHz) | Qualcomm Adreno 685 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 24.16 | 3.55 |
| Recency | 1 April 2026 | 2 October 2019 |
| Physical cores | 14 | 8 |
| Threads | 14 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 7 nm |
7 245HX has a 581% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 75% more physical cores and 75% more threads, and a 133% more advanced lithography process.
The Intel Core 7 245HX is our recommended choice as it beats the Microsoft SQ1 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
