Ryzen 9 9900X vs Core 2 Solo SU3500

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Solo SU3500
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 5 Watt
0.17
Ryzen 9 9900X
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 120 Watt
34.53
+20212%

Ryzen 9 9900X outperforms Core 2 Solo SU3500 by a whopping 20212% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Ryzen 9 9900X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3278108
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data66.82
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core 2 Solono data
Power efficiency2.9127.09
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Granite Ridge (2024)
Release date1 April 2009 (15 years ago)15 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$262$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Ryzen 9 9900X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads124
Base clock speed1.3 GHz4.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz5.6 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache3 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm4 nm
Die size107 mm22x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
Number of transistors410 Million16,630 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range1.05V-1.15Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Ryzen 9 9900X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA956AM5
Power consumption (TDP)5.5 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Ryzen 9 9900X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataSMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Ryzen 9 9900X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Ryzen 9 9900X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Ryzen 9 9900X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Ryzen 9 9900X.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data24

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.17 34.53
Recency 1 April 2009 15 August 2024
Physical cores 1 12
Threads 1 24
Chip lithography 45 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 120 Watt

Core 2 Solo SU3500 has 2300% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 9900X, on the other hand, has a 20211.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 9 9900X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Solo SU3500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core 2 Solo SU3500 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 9 9900X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Ryzen 9 9900X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Solo SU3500
Core 2 Solo SU3500
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X
Ryzen 9 9900X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 9 votes

Rate Core 2 Solo SU3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 175 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 9900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Solo SU3500 or Ryzen 9 9900X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.