Ryzen 9 7900X vs Core 2 Solo SU3500
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Core 2 Solo SU3500 by a whopping 18847% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Ryzen 9 7900X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3289 | 125 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Solo | no data |
| Power efficiency | 2.95 | 18.07 |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| Release date | 1 April 2009 (15 years ago) | 27 September 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $262 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Ryzen 9 7900X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 5.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 2x 70 (CCD) mm2 + 122 (I/O) mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 95 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 47 °C |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | CCD: 6,5 Mrd + IOD: 3,4 Mrd Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 1.05V-1.15V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Ryzen 9 7900X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA956 | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5.5 Watt | 170 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Ryzen 9 7900X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | 5 nm (CCD), 6 nm (I/O) nm, 0.650 - 1.475V |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Ryzen 9 7900X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Ryzen 9 7900X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Ryzen 9 7900X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5-5200 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Ryzen 9 7900X.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 24 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.17 | 32.21 |
| Recency | 1 April 2009 | 27 September 2022 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 12 |
| Threads | 1 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 170 Watt |
Core 2 Solo SU3500 has 3300% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 9 7900X, on the other hand, has a 18847.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.
The Ryzen 9 7900X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Solo SU3500 in performance tests.
Be aware that Core 2 Solo SU3500 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 9 7900X is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Ryzen 9 7900X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
