Core Solo U1400 vs Core 2 Solo SU3500
Aggregate performance score
Core 2 Solo SU3500 outperforms Core Solo U1400 by a whopping 114% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3525 | 3637 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Solo | Core Solo |
| Power efficiency | 1.15 | 0.54 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Yonah (2005−2006) |
| Release date | 1 April 2009 (16 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $262 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Core Solo U1400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 533 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 2 MB L2 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1.05V-1.15V | 0.85V - 1.1V |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Core Solo U1400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | BGA956 | PBGA479 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5.5 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Core Solo U1400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | - |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| FSB parity | - | - |
Security technologies
Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Core Solo U1400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Core Solo U1400 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | + |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.15 | 0.07 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 6 Watt |
Core 2 Solo SU3500 has a 114.3% higher aggregate performance score, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 20% lower power consumption.
The Intel Core 2 Solo SU3500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core Solo U1400 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
