Atom D525 vs Core 2 Solo SU3500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Atom D525 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 SoloIntel Atom
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Pinetrail (2009−2011)
Release date1 April 2009 (15 years ago)21 June 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$262$63

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Atom D525 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads14
Base clock speed1.3 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB112 KB
L2 cache3 MB1 MB
L3 cache3 MB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size107 mm287 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors410 Million176 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.05V-1.15Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Atom D525 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA956FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)5.5 Watt13 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Atom D525. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switching--
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Atom D525 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Atom D525 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Atom D525. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB
Max memory channelsno data1
Maximum memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel GMA 3150

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Solo SU3500 1468
+141%
Atom D525 610

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Solo SU3500 654
Atom D525 891
+36.3%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Core 2 Solo SU3500 112.25
Atom D525 55.25
+103%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2009 21 June 2010
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 4
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 13 Watt

Core 2 Solo SU3500 has 160% lower power consumption.

Atom D525, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Atom D525. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Atom D525, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Solo SU3500
Core 2 Solo SU3500
Intel Atom D525
Atom D525

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 9 votes

Rate Core 2 Solo SU3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 202 votes

Rate Atom D525 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Solo SU3500 or Atom D525, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.