Xeon Platinum 8160 vs Core 2 Solo SU3300
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Platinum 8160 outperforms Core 2 Solo SU3300 by a whopping 11093% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3604 | 460 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.92 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Solo | Intel Xeon Platinum |
| Power efficiency | 1.15 | 4.73 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| Release date | 20 August 2008 (17 years ago) | 25 April 2017 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $262 | $4,702 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Xeon Platinum 8160 have a nearly equal value for money.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Xeon Platinum 8160 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 48 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 21 |
| L1 cache | no data | 1.5 MB |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 24 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 33 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 85 °C |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Xeon Platinum 8160 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 8 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | BGA956 | FCLGA3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5.5 Watt | 150 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Xeon Platinum 8160. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
Security technologies
Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Xeon Platinum 8160 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Xeon Platinum 8160 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Xeon Platinum 8160. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 768 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 128.001 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Xeon Platinum 8160.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 48 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.15 | 16.79 |
| Recency | 20 August 2008 | 25 April 2017 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 24 |
| Threads | 1 | 48 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 150 Watt |
Core 2 Solo SU3300 has 2900% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 8160, on the other hand, has a 11093.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.
The Intel Xeon Platinum 8160 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Solo SU3300 in performance tests.
Be aware that Core 2 Solo SU3300 is a notebook processor while Xeon Platinum 8160 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
