Celeron 2.60 vs Core 2 Solo SU3300
Aggregate performance score
Core 2 Solo SU3300 outperforms Celeron 2.60 by an impressive 88% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3604 | 3701 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Solo | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.15 | 0.05 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Northwood (2002−2004) |
| Release date | 20 August 2008 (17 years ago) | June 2003 (22 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $262 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Celeron 2.60 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 8 KB |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 128 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 146 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | 55 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Celeron 2.60 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA956 | 478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5.5 Watt | 73 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Celeron 2.60. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR1, DDR2 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.15 | 0.08 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 73 Watt |
Core 2 Solo SU3300 has a 87.5% higher aggregate performance score, a 188.9% more advanced lithography process, and 1360% lower power consumption.
The Intel Core 2 Solo SU3300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron 2.60 in performance tests.
Be aware that Core 2 Solo SU3300 is a notebook processor while Celeron 2.60 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
