Sempron 2800+ vs Core 2 Solo SU3300

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Solo SU3300
2008
1 core / 1 thread, 5 Watt
0.16
+6.7%
Sempron 2800+
2001
1 core / 1 thread, 62 Watt
0.15

Core 2 Solo SU3300 outperforms Sempron 2800+ by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Sempron 2800+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32793297
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core 2 Solono data
Power efficiency2.750.23
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Manila (2001−2006)
Release date20 August 2008 (16 years ago)January 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$262$104

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Sempron 2800+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache3 MB256K
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm130 nm
Die size107 mm2144 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Million81 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Sempron 2800+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA956AM2
Power consumption (TDP)5.5 Watt62 Watt

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.16 0.15
Chip lithography 45 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 62 Watt

Core 2 Solo SU3300 has a 6.7% higher aggregate performance score, a 188.9% more advanced lithography process, and 1140% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Sempron 2800+.

Be aware that Core 2 Solo SU3300 is a notebook processor while Sempron 2800+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Sempron 2800+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Solo SU3300
Core 2 Solo SU3300
AMD Sempron 2800+
Sempron 2800+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate Core 2 Solo SU3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 47 votes

Rate Sempron 2800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Solo SU3300 or Sempron 2800+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.