GX-210JA vs Core 2 Solo SU3300

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Solo SU3300
2008
1 core / 1 thread, 5 Watt
0.16
GX-210JA
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.16

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Solo SU3300 and GX-210JA processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32793292
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 SoloAMD
Power efficiency2.752.52
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Temash (2013)
Release date20 August 2008 (16 years ago)23 May 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$262no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Solo SU3300 and GX-210JA basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz1 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache3 MB1 MB
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Solo SU3300 and GX-210JA compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA956FT3 BGA
Power consumption (TDP)5.5 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Solo SU3300 and GX-210JA. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI-+
AVX-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Solo SU3300 and GX-210JA. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 August 2008 23 May 2013
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 6 Watt

Core 2 Solo SU3300 has 20% lower power consumption.

GX-210JA, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core 2 Solo SU3300 and GX-210JA.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Solo SU3300 and GX-210JA, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Solo SU3300
Core 2 Solo SU3300
AMD GX-210JA
GX-210JA

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate Core 2 Solo SU3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 4 votes

Rate GX-210JA on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Solo SU3300 or GX-210JA, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.