EPYC 7473X vs Core 2 Solo SU3300
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7473X outperforms Core 2 Solo SU3300 by a whopping 23225% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Solo SU3300 and EPYC 7473X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3279 | 85 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Solo | no data |
| Power efficiency | 2.75 | 14.72 |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Milan-X (2022) |
| Release date | 20 August 2008 (16 years ago) | 22 March 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $262 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Solo SU3300 and EPYC 7473X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 48 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 768 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 8x 81 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | 33,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Solo SU3300 and EPYC 7473X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | BGA956 | SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5.5 Watt | 240 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Solo SU3300 and EPYC 7473X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Solo SU3300 and EPYC 7473X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Solo SU3300 and EPYC 7473X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-3200 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Solo SU3300 and EPYC 7473X.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.16 | 37.32 |
| Recency | 20 August 2008 | 22 March 2022 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 24 |
| Threads | 1 | 48 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 240 Watt |
Core 2 Solo SU3300 has 4700% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7473X, on the other hand, has a 23225% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
The EPYC 7473X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Solo SU3300 in performance tests.
Be aware that Core 2 Solo SU3300 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7473X is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Solo SU3300 and EPYC 7473X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
