Apple M4 Max (14 cores) vs Core 2 Solo SU3300
Aggregate performance score
Apple M4 Max (14 cores) outperforms Core 2 Solo SU3300 by a whopping 26613% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3402 | 63 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Solo | Apple M4 |
| Power efficiency | 2.79 | 51.17 |
| Designer | Intel | Apple |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | no data |
| Release date | 20 August 2008 (16 years ago) | 30 November 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $262 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Solo SU3300 and M4 Max (14 cores) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 14 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 4.51 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 3 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Solo SU3300 and M4 Max (14 cores) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | BGA956 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5.5 Watt | 80 Watt |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M4 32-core GPU |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.16 | 42.74 |
| Recency | 20 August 2008 | 30 November 2024 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 14 |
| Threads | 1 | 14 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 80 Watt |
Core 2 Solo SU3300 has 1500% lower power consumption.
Apple M4 Max (14 cores), on the other hand, has a 26612.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, 1300% more physical cores and 1300% more threads, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.
The Apple M4 Max (14 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Solo SU3300 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
