Core i7-13700E vs Core 2 Quad Q9505

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Quad Q9505
2009
95 Watt
1.39
Core i7-13700E
2023
16 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
22.45
+1515%

i7-13700E outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9505 by a whopping 1515% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Core i7-13700E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2136207
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.69no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameno dataRaptor Lake-S
Release date1 July 2009 (14 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price$42 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Core i7-13700E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threadsno data24
Base clock speed2.83 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speedno data5.1 GHz
L1 cacheno data80K (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Core i7-13700E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFCLGA775,LGA7751700
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Core i7-13700E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSXno data+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Core i7-13700E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Core i7-13700E are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Core i7-13700E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 770

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Core i7-13700E.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Quad Q9505 1.39
i7-13700E 22.45
+1515%

Core i7-13700E outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9505 by 1515% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Quad Q9505 2149
i7-13700E 34728
+1516%

Core i7-13700E outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9505 by 1516% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.39 22.45
Recency 1 July 2009 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

The Core i7-13700E is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Quad Q9505 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Core i7-13700E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505
Core 2 Quad Q9505
Intel Core i7-13700E
Core i7-13700E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 41 vote

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9505 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 9 votes

Rate Core i7-13700E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q9505 or Core i7-13700E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.