Core 2 Quad Q9505 vs Core i7-13700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-13700
2023
16 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
24.05
+1630%

i7-13700 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9505 by a whopping 1630% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-13700 and Core 2 Quad Q9505 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1902136
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation62.962.69
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-Sno data
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)1 July 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$384no data
Current price$349 (0.9x MSRP)$42

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-13700 has 2241% better value for money than Core 2 Quad Q9505.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-13700 and Core 2 Quad Q9505 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)no data
Threads24no data
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.83 GHz
Boost clock speed5.2 GHzno data
L1 cache80K (per core)no data
L2 cache2 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache30 MB (shared)6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm45 nm
Die size257 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C71 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierYesNo
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-13700 and Core 2 Quad Q9505 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1700FCLGA775,LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-13700 and Core 2 Quad Q9505. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+no data
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP+no data
Demand Based Switchingno data-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusLaunchedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core i7-13700 and Core 2 Quad Q9505 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-13700 and Core 2 Quad Q9505 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-13700 and Core 2 Quad Q9505. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5600, DDR4-3200no data
Maximum memory size192 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth89.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 770no data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.6 GHzno data
Execution Units32no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-13700 and Core 2 Quad Q9505 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-13700 and Core 2 Quad Q9505 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160 @ 60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-13700 and Core 2 Quad Q9505 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-13700 and Core 2 Quad Q9505.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-13700 24.05
+1630%
Core 2 Quad Q9505 1.39

Core i7-13700 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9505 by 1630% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-13700 37193
+1631%
Core 2 Quad Q9505 2149

Core i7-13700 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9505 by 1631% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-13700 2632
+635%
Core 2 Quad Q9505 358

Core i7-13700 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9505 by 635% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-13700 14811
+1328%
Core 2 Quad Q9505 1037

Core i7-13700 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9505 by 1328% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.05 1.39
Recency 4 January 2023 1 July 2009
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

The Core i7-13700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Quad Q9505 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-13700 and Core 2 Quad Q9505, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-13700
Core i7-13700
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505
Core 2 Quad Q9505

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 315 votes

Rate Core i7-13700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 41 vote

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9505 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-13700 or Core 2 Quad Q9505, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.