Mobile Pentium 4 532 vs Core 2 Quad Q9500
Aggregate performance score
Core 2 Quad Q9500 outperforms Mobile Pentium 4 532 by a whopping 536% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2398 | 3380 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Mobile Pentium 4 |
| Power efficiency | 0.57 | 0.10 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | no data | Prescott (2001−2005) |
| Release date | no data | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Quad Q9500 and Mobile Pentium 4 532 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.83 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 3.06 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1333 MHz | 533 MHz |
| L3 cache | 6 MB L2 Cache | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 71 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.3625V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Quad Q9500 and Mobile Pentium 4 532 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | LGA775 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 88 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9500 and Mobile Pentium 4 532. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Quad Q9500 and Mobile Pentium 4 532 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9500 and Mobile Pentium 4 532 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.40 | 0.22 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 88 Watt |
Core 2 Quad Q9500 has a 536.4% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Mobile Pentium 4 532, on the other hand, has 8% lower power consumption.
The Intel Core 2 Quad Q9500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Mobile Pentium 4 532 in performance tests.
Note that Core 2 Quad Q9500 is a desktop processor while Mobile Pentium 4 532 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
