Pentium E6600 vs Core 2 Quad Q9450

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Quad Q9450
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.38
+94.4%
Pentium E6600
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.71

Core 2 Quad Q9450 outperforms Pentium E6600 by an impressive 94% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Pentium E6600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22382712
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.02
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.381.03
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Wolfdale (2008−2010)
Release dateMarch 2008 (16 years ago)17 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$16

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Pentium E6600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.66 GHz3.06 GHz
Boost clock speed2.67 GHz0.07 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache12 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size2x 107 mm282 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data74 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors820 million228 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625V0.85V – 1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Pentium E6600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Pentium E6600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching--
FSB parity+no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Pentium E6600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Pentium E6600 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Pentium E6600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Pentium E6600.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Quad Q9450 1.38
+94.4%
Pentium E6600 0.71

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Quad Q9450 2186
+93.8%
Pentium E6600 1128

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Quad Q9450 344
Pentium E6600 353
+2.6%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Quad Q9450 952
+65.3%
Pentium E6600 576

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.38 0.71
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q9450 has a 94.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Pentium E6600, on the other hand, has 46.2% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Quad Q9450 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium E6600 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Pentium E6600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450
Core 2 Quad Q9450
Intel Pentium E6600
Pentium E6600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 179 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 164 votes

Rate Pentium E6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q9450 or Pentium E6600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.