Celeron E3200 vs Core 2 Quad Q9450

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Celeron E3200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	2221	2850
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	2.88
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Power efficiency	1.37	0.77
Architecture codename	Yorkfield (2007−2009)	Wolfdale (2008−2010)
Release date	March 2008 (16 years ago)	30 August 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$52

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Celeron E3200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	4	2
Base clock speed	2.66 GHz	2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.67 GHz	2.4 GHz
Bus rate	1333 MHz	no data
L1 cache	64K (per core)	64 KB (per core)
L2 cache	12 MB (shared)	1 MB (shared)
L3 cache	0 KB	0 KB
Chip lithography	45 nm	45 nm
Die size	2x 107 mm2	82 mm2
Maximum core temperature	no data	74 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	71 °C	no data
Number of transistors	820 million	228 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
VID voltage range	0.85V-1.3625V	0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Celeron E3200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	LGA775	LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Celeron E3200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	-	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	-
Idle States	+	+
Thermal Monitoring	+	+
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
FSB parity	+	no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Celeron E3200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	-
EDB	+	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Celeron E3200 are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	-
VT-x	+	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Celeron E3200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Celeron E3200.

PCIe version

no data

2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	1.40	0.54
Physical cores	4	2
Threads	4	2
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	65 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Celeron E3200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---