Core 2 Extreme QX9650 vs Core 2 Quad Q9000
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2902 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.02 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Quad | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.85 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Yorkfield (2007−2009) |
| Release date | 1 January 2009 (17 years ago) | November 2007 (18 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $348 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Core 2 Extreme QX9650: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1066 MHz | 1333 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 6 MB | 12 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB L2 Cache | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 2x 107 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 64 °C |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | 820 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 1.05V-1.175V | 0.85V-1.3625V |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Core 2 Extreme QX9650 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | PGA478 | LGA775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 130 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Core 2 Extreme QX9650. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | - | - |
| FSB parity | - | + |
Security technologies
Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Core 2 Extreme QX9650 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | - |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Core 2 Extreme QX9650 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Core 2 Extreme QX9650. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 130 Watt |
Core 2 Quad Q9000 has 65% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core 2 Quad Q9000 is a notebook processor while Core 2 Extreme QX9650 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
