Celeron M 380 vs Core 2 Quad Q6600

Place in the ranking	2388	3284
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Desktop processor	Laptop
Series	Core 2 Quad (Desktop)	Celeron M
Power efficiency	1.04	0.77
Architecture codename	Kentsfield (2007)	Dothan (2004−2005)
Release date	no data	no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Celeron M 380 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	4	1
Base clock speed	no data	1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.4 GHz	1.6 GHz
Bus rate	1066 MHz	400 MHz
L1 cache	64K (per core)	no data
L2 cache	8 MB (shared)	no data
L3 cache	0 KB	1 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography	65 nm	90 nm
Die size	2x 143 mm²	no data
Maximum core temperature	no data	100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	71 °C	no data
Number of transistors	582 million	no data
64 bit support	+	-
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
VID voltage range	no data	1.004V-1.292V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Celeron M 380 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	no data
Socket	775	PPGA478, H-PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)	105 Watt	21 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Celeron M 380. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	-
Turbo Boost Technology	no data	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	no data	-
Idle States	no data	-
Demand Based Switching	no data	-
PAE	no data	32 Bit
FSB parity	no data	-

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Celeron M 380 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	no data	-
EDB	no data	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Celeron M 380 are enumerated here.

VT-x

no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Celeron M 380. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.15	0.17
Physical cores	4	1
Threads	4	1
Chip lithography	65 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	105 Watt	21 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q6600 has a 576.5% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M 380, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Quad Q6600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 380 in performance tests.

Note that Core 2 Quad Q6600 is a desktop processor while Celeron M 380 is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q6600 and Celeron M 380, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.