Atom Z550 vs Core 2 Quad Q6600

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Atom Z550 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2370not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesCore 2 Quad (Desktop)Intel Atom
Power efficiency1.03no data
Architecture codenameKentsfield (2007)Silverthorne (2008−2010)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)8 April 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Atom Z550 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads42
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rate1066 MHz533.33 MT/s
Multiplierno data15
L1 cacheno data56 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data26 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistorsno data47 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Atom Z550 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
Socketno dataPBGA441
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt2.4 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Atom Z550. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Atom Z550 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Atom Z550 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Atom Z550. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataunknown

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Quad Q6600 1819
+377%
Atom Z550 381

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Quad Q6600 2460
+274%
Atom Z550 657

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Core 2 Quad Q6600 8800
+798%
Atom Z550 980

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 2 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q6600 has 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Atom Z550, on the other hand, has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 5150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q6600 and Atom Z550. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core 2 Quad Q6600 is a desktop processor while Atom Z550 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q6600 and Atom Z550, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
Core 2 Quad Q6600
Intel Atom Z550
Atom Z550

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1757 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4 votes

Rate Atom Z550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q6600 or Atom Z550, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.