Athlon 64 X2 4600+ vs Core 2 Quad Q6600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q6600 and Athlon 64 X2 4600+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2270not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.77no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesCore 2 Quad (Desktop)2x Athlon 64 (Desktop)
Architecture codenameKentsfield (2007)Windsor (2006−2009)
Release dateno datano data
Current price$67 $50

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q6600 and Athlon 64 X2 4600+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus support1066 MHz1000 MHz
Chip lithography65 nm90 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q6600 and Athlon 64 X2 4600+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt65 Watt

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Quad Q6600 1813
+152%
Athlon 64 X2 4600+ 720

Core 2 Quad Q6600 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 4600+ by 152% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Quad Q6600 270
+18.9%
Athlon 64 X2 4600+ 227

Core 2 Quad Q6600 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 4600+ by 19% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Quad Q6600 770
+88.3%
Athlon 64 X2 4600+ 409

Core 2 Quad Q6600 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 4600+ by 88% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Core 2 Quad Q6600 2460
+27.5%
Athlon 64 X2 4600+ 1930

Core 2 Quad Q6600 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 4600+ by 27% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Quad Q6600 8800
+135%
Athlon 64 X2 4600+ 3740

Core 2 Quad Q6600 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 4600+ by 135% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 65 Watt

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q6600 and Athlon 64 X2 4600+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q6600 and Athlon 64 X2 4600+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
Core 2 Quad Q6600
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+
Athlon 64 X2 4600+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1681 vote

Rate Core 2 Quad Q6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 102 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q6600 or Athlon 64 X2 4600+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.