Athlon 64 LE-1620 vs Core 2 Quad Q6600

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Athlon 64 LE-1620 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2355not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesCore 2 Quad (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency1.03no data
Architecture codenameKentsfield (2007)Windsor (2006−2007)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)October 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Athlon 64 LE-1620 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data128K
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data230 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data69 °C
Number of transistorsno data227 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Athlon 64 LE-1620 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataAM2
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt45 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Athlon 64 LE-1620. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 45 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q6600 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon 64 LE-1620, on the other hand, has 133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q6600 and Athlon 64 LE-1620. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q6600 and Athlon 64 LE-1620, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
Core 2 Quad Q6600
AMD Athlon 64 LE-1620
Athlon 64 LE-1620

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1736 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 14 votes

Rate Athlon 64 LE-1620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q6600 or Athlon 64 LE-1620, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.