A9-9420e vs Core 2 Extreme X9000

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core 2 Extreme X9000
2008
2 cores / 2 threads
0.71
A9-9420e
2018
2 cores / 2 threads
0.72
+1.4%

A9-9420e outperforms Core 2 Extreme X9000 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Core 2 Extreme X9000 and A9-9420e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking25632554
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 ExtremeAMD Bristol Ridge
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date10 January 2008 (16 years ago)1 June 2018 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$851no data
Current price$450 (0.5x MSRP)$380

Technical specs

Core 2 Extreme X9000 and A9-9420e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.8 GHzno data
Bus support800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache6 MB1 MB
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size107 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C90 °C
Number of transistors410 Million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range1V-1.275Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme X9000 and A9-9420e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPGA478BGA
Power consumption (TDP)44 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme X9000 and A9-9420e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataSingle-Channel DDR4-2133?, Virtualization,
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core 2 Extreme X9000 and A9-9420e technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme X9000 and A9-9420e are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme X9000 and A9-9420e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Extreme X9000 0.71
A9-9420e 0.72
+1.4%

A9-9420e outperforms Core 2 Extreme X9000 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Extreme X9000 1099
A9-9420e 1108
+0.8%

A9-9420e outperforms Core 2 Extreme X9000 by 1% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 0.71 0.72
Recency 10 January 2008 1 June 2018
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Extreme X9000 and A9-9420e. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme X9000 and A9-9420e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme X9000
Core 2 Extreme X9000
AMD A9-9420e
A9-9420e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 39 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme X9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 134 votes

Rate A9-9420e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme X9000 or A9-9420e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.