EPYC 9655P vs Core 2 Extreme X9000

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Extreme X9000
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 44 Watt
0.69
EPYC 9655P
2024
96 cores / 192 threads, 400 Watt
100.00
+14393%

EPYC 9655P outperforms Core 2 Extreme X9000 by a whopping 14393% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Extreme X9000 and EPYC 9655P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27111
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.48
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core 2 Extremeno data
Power efficiency1.4823.66
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Turin (2024)
Release date10 January 2008 (16 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$851$10,811

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Extreme X9000 and EPYC 9655P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)96
Threads2192
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache6 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm4 nm
Die size107 mm212x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Million99,780 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range1V-1.275Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme X9000 and EPYC 9655P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPGA478SP5
Power consumption (TDP)44 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme X9000 and EPYC 9655P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core 2 Extreme X9000 and EPYC 9655P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme X9000 and EPYC 9655P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme X9000 and EPYC 9655P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Extreme X9000 and EPYC 9655P.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Extreme X9000 0.69
EPYC 9655P 100.00
+14393%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Extreme X9000 1099
EPYC 9655P 158845
+14354%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.69 100.00
Recency 10 January 2008 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 96
Threads 2 192
Chip lithography 45 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 44 Watt 400 Watt

Core 2 Extreme X9000 has 809.1% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9655P, on the other hand, has a 14392.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, 4700% more physical cores and 9500% more threads, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9655P is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Extreme X9000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core 2 Extreme X9000 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9655P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme X9000 and EPYC 9655P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme X9000
Core 2 Extreme X9000
AMD EPYC 9655P
EPYC 9655P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 40 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme X9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 66 votes

Rate EPYC 9655P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme X9000 or EPYC 9655P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.