EPYC 9654 vs Core 2 Extreme X9000

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core 2 Extreme X9000
2008
2 cores / 2 threads
0.70
EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads
78.29
+11084%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Core 2 Extreme X9000 by 11084% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Core 2 Extreme X9000 and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking25684
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for moneyno data10.14
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core 2 ExtremeAMD EPYC
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Genoa
Release date10 January 2008 (16 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$851$11,805
Current price$450 (0.5x MSRP)$4544 (0.4x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Technical specs

Core 2 Extreme X9000 and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)96
Threads2192
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus support800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache6 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size107 mm212x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range1V-1.275Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme X9000 and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketPGA478SP5
Power consumption (TDP)44 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme X9000 and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core 2 Extreme X9000 and EPYC 9654 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme X9000 and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme X9000 and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Extreme X9000 and EPYC 9654.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Extreme X9000 0.70
EPYC 9654 78.29
+11084%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Core 2 Extreme X9000 by 11084% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Extreme X9000 1099
EPYC 9654 122091
+11009%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Core 2 Extreme X9000 by 11009% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Extreme X9000 421
EPYC 9654 1829
+334%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Core 2 Extreme X9000 by 334% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Extreme X9000 719
EPYC 9654 18566
+2482%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Core 2 Extreme X9000 by 2482% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 0.70 78.29
Recency 10 January 2008 10 November 2022
Physical cores 2 96
Threads 2 192
Cost $851 $11805
Chip lithography 45 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 44 Watt 360 Watt

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Extreme X9000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core 2 Extreme X9000 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9654 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme X9000 and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme X9000
Core 2 Extreme X9000
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 39 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme X9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 978 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme X9000 or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.