Athlon MP 2800+ vs Core 2 Extreme X9000

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Extreme X9000
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 44 Watt
0.69
+123%
Athlon MP 2800+
2003
1 core / 1 thread, 60 Watt
0.31

Core 2 Extreme X9000 outperforms Athlon MP 2800+ by a whopping 123% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Athlon MP 2800+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27113086
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core 2 ExtremeAMD Athlon MP
Power efficiency1.480.49
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)K7 (2000−2004)
Release date10 January 2008 (16 years ago)6 May 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$851$275

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Athlon MP 2800+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2.13 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rate800 MHz266 MT/s
Multiplierno data16
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache6 MB512 KB
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm130 nm
Die size107 mm2101 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Million54 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1V-1.275Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Athlon MP 2800+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketPGA478no data
Power consumption (TDP)44 Watt60 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Athlon MP 2800+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Athlon MP 2800+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Athlon MP 2800+ are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Athlon MP 2800+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Extreme X9000 0.69
+123%
Athlon MP 2800+ 0.31

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Extreme X9000 1099
+121%
Athlon MP 2800+ 497

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.69 0.31
Recency 10 January 2008 6 May 2003
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 44 Watt 60 Watt

Core 2 Extreme X9000 has a 122.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 188.9% more advanced lithography process, and 36.4% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Extreme X9000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon MP 2800+ in performance tests.

Be aware that Core 2 Extreme X9000 is a notebook processor while Athlon MP 2800+ is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Athlon MP 2800+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme X9000
Core 2 Extreme X9000
AMD Athlon MP 2800+
Athlon MP 2800+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 40 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme X9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Athlon MP 2800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme X9000 or Athlon MP 2800+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.