Athlon 64 X2 5200+ vs Core 2 Extreme X9000

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Extreme X9000
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 44 Watt
0.71
+29.1%

Core 2 Extreme X9000 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 5200+ by a significant 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26772813
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core 2 Extremeno data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Windsor (2006−2007)
Release date10 January 2008 (16 years ago)September 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$851no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2.7 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB256 KB
L2 cache6 MB512K
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die size107 mm2220 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Million154 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1V-1.275Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPGA478AM2
Power consumption (TDP)44 Watt89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Extreme X9000 0.71
+29.1%
Athlon 64 X2 5200+ 0.55

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Extreme X9000 1099
+29.9%
Athlon 64 X2 5200+ 846

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Extreme X9000 421
+66.4%
Athlon 64 X2 5200+ 253

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Extreme X9000 719
+62.7%
Athlon 64 X2 5200+ 442

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.71 0.55
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 44 Watt 89 Watt

Core 2 Extreme X9000 has a 29.1% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 102.3% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Extreme X9000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 5200+ in performance tests.

Be aware that Core 2 Extreme X9000 is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 X2 5200+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme X9000
Core 2 Extreme X9000
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+
Athlon 64 X2 5200+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 40 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme X9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 305 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme X9000 or Athlon 64 X2 5200+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.