Xeon 5160 vs Core 2 Extreme QX9300

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Extreme QX9300
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
1.16
+87.1%
Xeon 5160
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 80 Watt
0.62

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 outperforms Xeon 5160 by an impressive 87% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Xeon 5160 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23762785
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.15
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesCore 2 Extremeno data
Power efficiency2.390.72
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Woodcrest (2006)
Release dateAugust 2008 (16 years ago)June 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$22

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Xeon 5160 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.53 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.53 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB0 KB
L2 cache12 MB4 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size2x 107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C65 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage range1.05V-1.175VB2=1.0V-1.5V, G0=.85V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Xeon 5160 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketPGA478LGA771
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Xeon 5160. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching--
PAEno data32 Bit
AMT+no data
FSB parity-+

Security technologies

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Xeon 5160 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Xeon 5160 are enumerated here.

VT-x++
EPTno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Xeon 5160. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 1.16
+87.1%
Xeon 5160 0.62

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 1805
+87.4%
Xeon 5160 963

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.16 0.62
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 80 Watt

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 has a 87.1% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 77.8% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Extreme QX9300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon 5160 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core 2 Extreme QX9300 is a notebook processor while Xeon 5160 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Xeon 5160, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9300
Core 2 Extreme QX9300
Intel Xeon 5160
Xeon 5160

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 91 vote

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX9300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 8 votes

Rate Xeon 5160 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme QX9300 or Xeon 5160, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.