EPYC 9535 vs Core 2 Extreme QX9300

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and EPYC 9535 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2379not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesCore 2 Extremeno data
Power efficiency2.40no data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Turin (2024)
Release dateAugust 2008 (16 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$8,992

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and EPYC 9535 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads4128
Base clock speed2.53 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.53 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache12 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm4 nm
Die size2x 107 mm28x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage range1.05V-1.175Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and EPYC 9535 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketPGA478SP5
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt300 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and EPYC 9535. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
AMT+no data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and EPYC 9535 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and EPYC 9535 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and EPYC 9535. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and EPYC 9535.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 64
Threads 4 128
Chip lithography 45 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 300 Watt

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 has 566.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9535, on the other hand, has 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and EPYC 9535. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core 2 Extreme QX9300 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9535 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and EPYC 9535, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9300
Core 2 Extreme QX9300
AMD EPYC 9535
EPYC 9535

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 91 vote

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX9300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9535 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme QX9300 or EPYC 9535, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.